Archive for June, 2009

ProPublica: Mortgage Aid Program Continues to Move Slowly

by Alexandra Andrews, ProPublica

Deborah Sherman from Oakland, Calif. has been waiting for months to hear back on her loan modfiication application.The Obama administration estimates that it’s going to help as many as 4 million homeowners modify their loans. To date, “over 200,000″ of these loan modifications have been offered, according to the Treasury Department. That leaves millions of homeowners waiting their turn.

Deborah Sherman from Oakland, Calif., is somewhere in that queue. She says she applied for a loan modification through the government’s program one day after it was announced on March 4. Since then, she says all she’s heard from Chase, her loan servicer, is: It could take up to 90 days. Please keep waiting.

She’s still waiting.

Sherman’s story is hardly unique. As we reported in early June, the program got off to a chaotic start as hordes of homeowners nationwide jammed servicers’ phone lines and overwhelmed their staff. Housing counselors and frustrated homeowners reported long delays and mixed messages about eligibility requirements.

Last Tuesday, President Obama expressed disappointment with the program’s progress, saying at a press briefing, “I think … our mortgage program has actually helped to modify mortgages for a lot of people, but it hasn’t been keeping pace with all the foreclosures that are taking place.” Obama said that he gets complaints from homeowners every day and is still asking his staff to tweak the program and make it more aggressive.

His remarks were echoed by Elizabeth Warren, chairwoman of the Congressional Oversight Panel, which oversees the Treasury Department’s response to the financial crisis, and Richard Neiman, superintendent of banks for the state of New York, at a congressional hearing on Wednesday.

At the hearing, Warren and Neiman grilled Herb Allison, the Treasury Department’s bailout overseer, about the administration’s mortgage plan, citing some of the same problems we’ve been hearing. Allison said that it had taken a couple of weeks for the government and the banks to get the program off the ground, but that things are now “moving very rapidly.”

Herb Allison, the Treasury bailout overseer (Getty Images).
But at times, Allison’s testimony seemed at odds with the reports we’ve been hearing from homeowners and housing counselors, a disconnect Warren was quick to point out.

For instance, Allison said, “I think it’s important that the public realize they don’t have to have missed a payment on their mortgage to get help. If they see that they have a problem … they should get in touch with their servicer.”

Warren responded, “What we continue to hear is that you can’t get a servicer on the phone, or when you do get a servicer on the phone, you receive incorrect information.” She said she’s heard from homeowners who say they were told by their servicers that they’re ineligible for the government’s program because they aren’t behind on their payments, which is incorrect. We’ve heard borrowers say the same thing.

Warren added, “I feel bad if what comes out of this is you say I want to tell Americans that they need to reach out to their servicers. They’re doing that.”

Indeed, Sherman, the California-homeowner we’ve been in touch with, has reached out to Chase by phone, by fax, by mail and in person at her local Chase homeownership center. But the “We’re here for you!” banner at the homeownership center was not for her, she says: It was only for customers who were facing foreclosure.

Sherman is a self-employed commercial photographer who purchased a condo in 2000. She started really struggling last year when her work dwindled down to almost nothing. She’s now looking for work in a different field. She doesn’t owe more than her home is worth. When she heard about Obama’s plan, she thought, “This is perfect.”

She passed all the eligibility hurdles on the government’s Web site, she says, and went to Chase’s Web site the day after the plan was announced. It had all the information and all the necessary forms. Sherman faxed in months of bank statements, two years of tax returns, a hardship letter, income statements and other financial documentation – more than 60 pages in all. 

Sherman followed up consistently after that. But, she says, “I’ve received nothing. Not a phone call, not an e-mail, not a letter, nothing.” Her loan officer’s voice mailbox is full, she says. Everyone she speaks to tells her it could take up to 90 days.

Tom Kelly, a Chase spokesman, says the bank first started processing loan modification applications for the government’s program on April 4 and that it has given highest priority to the most delinquent customers. It’s also hired 950 new loan counselors since Jan. 1, he says. “We’re just working our way through the applications.”

When Sherman spoke with a Chase representative in mid-June, she says she was told she’d have to send in updated financial information since she’d now been waiting for three months.

Sherman complied, but she had a question for the Chase rep: “So all this time – these past 90 days – that I’ve been thinking an answer could come any day, no one was even looking at my file?”

All the rep could say was that files were getting forwarded to a new department for processing.

In a New York Times article on Monday, Michael Barr, the assistant treasury secretary for financial institutions, expressed frustration with loan servicers. “They need to do a much better job on the basic management and operational side of their firms,” he said. “What we’ve been pushing the servicers to do is improve their infrastructure to make sure their call centers are doing a better job. The level of training is not there yet.”

Barr estimated that by the end of August, the program would be churning out 20,000 loan modifications a week.

Alexandra Andrews is an assistant editor for ProPublica, America’s largest investigative newsroom.

Read more: Elizabeth Warren, Treasury Department, Chase Bank, Herb Allison, Loan Modification, Housing, Richard Nieman, Politics News

Deed-In-Lieu Vs. Foreclosure: A Couple Has No Option But To Hand Over The Keys

This is Dispatches from the Displaced, where we share the stories of homeowners hit hard by the housing crisis. Foreclosure is both emotionally and financially devastating — it’s a black mark, like bankruptcy, that remains on a credit report for seven years. We’ve heard from people across the US who have tried to avoid foreclosure through short sales and loan modifications, but some homeowners who haven’t had any luck with either turn to another alternative: a Deed in Lieu of foreclosure.

Essentially, in a deed in lieu of foreclosure, a homeowner who is unable to make their mortgage payments hands over their property to the lender instead of going through foreclosure proceedings.

Jenny Kakasuleff and Brandon Rogers, a couple from Indiana, ended up pursuing a deed in lieu when it became clear that negotiations with their lender were going nowhere fast. Although they had received two short sale offers for their home, the bank wouldn’t accept them, and instead of going into foreclosure, Jenny and Brandon decided to provide a deed in lieu and hand over the keys:

My husband and I bought our first home in 2005 — we were 24 and 26 years old at the time — and I was selling real estate (prior to completing my degree). Our mortgage increased from $900 to $1100 in 2008 due to property tax increases, which just so happened to be when our income took a hit.

When it became clear we could no longer afford our home, we tried to put it on the market to sell it, but it was no longer worth what we owed. After allowing the payment to go for a few months (the bank would only consider a short-sale if we were delinquent), we managed to convince the bank to consider a short-sale. We received two offers for our home — as a former real estate professional, they were fair offers, not unlike what the bank could receive if they foreclosed on the property and attempted to sell it — yet the bank denied both.

We wish that they would have worked with us on refinancing, or bringing down our payment, or even on accepting an offer. They did not accept the offers, in my opinion, because we were insured through FHA, so why take less than the home was worth, when the bank can just foreclose and receive any difference they are unable to get through the sale from the government?

They don’t care that we’ll never be able to buy a house again, or that we tried to do right by them. We have now applied to give them a deed in lieu of foreclosure–an option that we are told is not as bad as a real foreclosure. We’ll see what happens.

I understand that lots of people got into homes they couldn’t afford; but what about people like us? We could afford the home when we bought it, but we came across tough times and property taxes raised our payment. We tried to do right by the bank and dispense with the home when it was clear we could no longer afford it.

“At this point,” Jenny said, “we are waiting for the bank to accept the deed, and we have reason to believe they will.”

Read more: Deed in Lieu, Mortgages, Short Sale, Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure, Housing Crisis, Dispatches From the Displaced, Ee, Business News

Housing Recovery In Peril As Obama Aid Program Has Little Effect

June 29 (Bloomberg) — Driving through Riverside, California, Bruce Norris pointed to a half-dozen empty houses with “For Sale” signs stuck in untended lawns that he said investors might buy if banks would just extend some credit.

Read more: Fastest Foreclosure Rate, Mortgage Modification, Economy, Obama Homebuyers Tax Credit, Obama Financial Crisis, Obama, Obama Housing Crisis, Housing Crisis, Home News

Jim Randel: The #1 Lesson of the Housing Crisis

I have now tracked the housing crisis carefully for several years. I have read twenty books on the subject, hundreds of articles and spoken with tons of experts. So, I feel that I have the standing to opine on the #1 lesson to take from the housing mess.

And that lesson is EDUCATE YOURSELF. Do not rely on the government to protect you. Do not rely on the good faith of your friendly real estate agent or mortgage broker. Do not depend upon your attorney or title carrier to help you avoid pitfalls. EDUCATE YOURSELF.

The housing crisis would never have happened if most people understood any or all of the following:

#1 No asset class can always go up in value. Economies are cyclical.

#2
Real estate agents have an incentive to convince you to buy houses — and, as many house as possible.

#3
Mortgage brokers have an incentive to persuade you to take a loan which may not be in your best interest.

#4 Lenders are not your friend. They are business people with their own agenda, which may not be in your best interest.

#5 Attorneys do not generally explain to you the business (and at times legal) risks of the house purchase and/or financing process.

#6 House inspectors need to keep their referral sources happy — that means real estate agents. So, some inspectors will be less-than-forthcoming.

#7 Leverage is a two-way street. It is great when prices are rising. But, when prices fall even a modest amount, your equity can be totally wiped out and very quickly.

#8
Houses are money pits. You will expend more on your house than you think.

#9 Buying a house is ONLY an investment IF: (i) prices rise, OR (ii) you analyze the purchase on an income basis, i.e., what would someone rent for your house and how that amount relates to ownership expenses and debt.

#10
The biggest risk of homeownership is illiquidity as many people are today discovering. They may wish to downsize to save money, or move to take advantage of employment opportunities, but they cannot sell their house. Default and/or foreclosure which damage one’s credit rating may be the only answer.

None of this stuff is rocket science. It is within everybody’s ability to understand the basic principles of home ownership and debt. It is easy to blame all the “bad guys” who created the housing and foreclosure crisis — and there are plenty of those. But, the real blame lies on the doorstep of every person who did not take the time to educate himself or herself, who did not reach out with advice and counsel for friends or family new to the home buying process, who did not take an instructive role in their community if/when they saw problems brewing, who was elected to lead but did not take the time or invest the energy to understand the issues and deal with them proactively.

Today’s crisis is housing. Tomorrow’s will be something else. The ultimate protection we all have is to make well-informed decisions on how, when and under what terms we spend our money. Then, if a problem arises, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

Jim Randel is the author of The Skinny on the Housing Crisis (RAND, 2009), the winner of the Robert Bruss Gold Medal for excellence. The Bruss Award is sponsored by NAREE, an organization of 650 journalists and professionals who cover housing, finance and business.

Read more: Investing, Housing Market, Homeowners, Foreclosure, Bankruptcy, Economy, Housing Crisis, Business News

Secretary Donovan awards over $1 billion in Recovery Act Funds to jump-start affordable housing construction in 26 states

WASHINGTON – U.S. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan today announced that HUD is approving plans submitted by state
housing finance agencies for $1,035,322,485to jump start affordable housing programs in states throughout the countrythat are currently stalled due
to the economic recession. Funded through American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), HUD’s new Tax Credit Assistance Program
(TCAP)will allow 26 state housing finance agencies to resume funding of affordable rental housing projects across the nation while stimulating
employment in the hard-hit construction trades.

Business Bloggers To Debate CRA Role In Housing Crisis For $100K

Hey, everybody! Want to make a quick and dirty $100,000? All you have to do is beat Barry Ritholtz, business journalist and author of Bailout Nation in a debate over whether the Community Reinvestment Act caused the entire housing industry to melt down into unending crisis. Here’s Ritholtz, serving it up:

I’ve run out of patience with tired memes and discredited claims by fools and partisans.

[...]

Well, its time to put up or shut up: I hereby challenge any of those who believe the CRA is at prime fault in the housing boom and collapse, and economic morass we are in to a debate. The question for debate: “Is the CRA significantly to blame for the credit crisis?”

A mutually agreed upon time and place, outcome determined by a fair jury, for any dollar amount between $10,000 up to $100,000 dollars (i.e., for more than just bragging rights).

There’s no shortage of potential challengers. You can pull a veritable rogue’s gallery of CRA paranoiacs from this posting from Mary Kane at FAIR: Charles Krauthammer, Neil Cavuto, Lisa Schiffren, Alex Castellanos, even Rush Limbaugh. But according to Felix Salmon, it looks like Ritholtz is going to sparring with Clusterstock’s John Carney.

That’ll make for an interesting debate. Carney’s only recently changed his mind on the CRA issue. On June 23, Carney published a post entitled, “Sorry, Folks, The CRA Really Did Require Crap Lending Standards.” Carney followed up with a flurry of blog entries after that, and is today looking for backers. (Carney has a fair question, by the way, on how, exactly a “winner” in this debate is to be determined.)

Reuters’ Felix Salmon is of the mind that Carney’s crazy, but nevermind that! I don’t see Salmon risking any of his green on this.

So, that’s today’s update on how your financial journalists are diddling around, making high-stakes blog wars with each other while everyone else in the world slides slowly and inevitably into unemployment.

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

Read more: Community Reinvestment Act, Subprime Mortgages, Subprime Mortgage Crisis, Housing Crisis, Debates, Media News

Obama’s Housing Plan Struggling In First Few Months

Earlier this month, we reported that President Obama’s “Making Home Affordable” program, a government subsidized mortgage modification plan, was mired in red tape, delays and questionable benefits for homeowners. But that’s not the only area of Obama’s housing recovery plan that’s struggling. Despite putting a total of $275 billion on housing recovery efforts, Obama’s attempts to spur housing markets have sputtered.

Today, both the New York Times and Bloomberg have focused on the kinks in Obama’s plan to stabilize the real estate market.

The New York Times zeroes in on Obama’s plan to offer homeowners new mortgage deals. As of June, the New York Times reported that Obama’s $75 billion homeowner bailout had succeeded in modifying only 100,000 loans nationwide. Under the plan, mortgage servicing companies are offered $1,000 for each loan they modify, plus an additional $1,000 for up to three years. The NYT takes a look inside some of the call centers that are charged with offering mortgage modifications to homeowners. Unfortunately, the results are typical of many call centers. Here’s the NYT’s assessment:

“…in the four months since the Treasury Department announced the program, millions of new homeowners have slipped into delinquency and foreclosure. For now, progress is constrained by the limited capacities of mortgage servicing companies, said Michael S. Barr, the assistant Treasury secretary for financial institutions. He offered the first signs of the administration’s impatience with the institutions that control home loans.

“They need to do a much better job on the basic management and operational side of their firms,” Mr. Barr said. “What we’ve been pushing the servicers to do is improve their infrastructure to make sure their call centers are doing a better job. The level of training is not there yet.”

Obama’s larger housing recovery plan has done little to boost home-buying, Bloomberg points out today. Banks are still skittish about offering loans to real estate investors, and mortgage lending is currently at a 13-year low. Bloomberg quotes Eric Belsky, executive director of Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies as saying that Obama’s $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers has failed to significantly help the market.

Undercutting any other signs of hope in the housing market, are some troubling fundamentals. Here’s Bloomberg’s round-up of the data:

“Personal bankruptcies rose 37 percent in May from a year earlier, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute, based in Alexandria, Virginia. Credit card defaults in the first quarter went to 7.79 percent from 4.83 percent a year ago, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. data show. While the share of loans entering foreclosure moved to 1.37 percent, the highest ever, the first-quarter mortgage delinquency rate climbed to a record 9.12 percent, the Washington-based Mortgage Bankers Association said.

About 20.4 million of the 93 million houses, condos and co- ops in the U.S. were worth less than their loans as of March 31, according to Seattle-based real estate data service Zillow.com.”

Get HuffPost Business On Facebook and Twitter!

Read more: Real Estate Crisis, Mortgage Modification, Real Estate Prices, Making Home Affordable Act, Obama Homeowner Bailout, Housing Crisis, Business News

Community Reinvestment Act: Did It Cause The Housing Crisis?

I’ve run out of patience with tired memes and discredited claims by fools and partisan.

The rhetoric of those pushing nonsense on the public in an attempt to confuse rather than illuminate — the phrase is “agnotology” — only serves to aid the lobbyists working on behalf of the Banks and Investment houses to maintain the status quo.

Get HuffPost Business On Facebook and Twitter!

Read more: Real Estate Crisis, Community Reinvestment Act, The Big Picture, Cra, Housing Crisis, Barry-Rithholtz, Causes of the Housing Bubble, Business News

The 10 Most Heavily Discounted Housing Markets

As the historic real estate bust continues to gut home prices throughout the country, property owners everywhere are scrambling to attract buyers. For some home sellers, that might mean chipping in for closing costs; others might try to sweeten the dealby handing out perks, like a free parking spot. But for many homeowners, the most efficient way to sell a home in a depressed market is to simply drop the listing price. Such price reductions are welcome news for would-be buyers and represent–along with low mortgage rates and the federal first-time home buyer tax credit–a compelling incentive to jump into the market. But while the housing collapse has been a national event, not all markets have been hit with equal force.

Get HuffPost Business On Facebook and Twitter!

Read more: Real Estate Crisis, Housing Market, Manhattn, Chicago, Housing Prices, Los Angeles, Real Estate, Miami, Business News

Jim Randel: Housing Crisis Solution: Bring in the Entrepreneurs

Last week I attended a conference about the housing crisis in Washington, D.C. Speakers included several senior Administration officials and members of Congress.

I learned what the government is doing and thinking.

Here was my take on what I heard:

The people handling the government’s approach to the housing crisis are bright, well-intentioned and committed. They are also academic, theoretical and insulated. For the most part, they are life-long public servants or politicians. Nothing wrong with that, of course. They can just get a little lost when trying to connect the dots in the street.

Life-long public servants tend to lose contact with how real people act in real situations. The way they obtain information is from government reports and hearings. The people from whom they learn usually have a job to protect, an agenda to sell or an unfounded deference. This view from 30,000 feet is nice I guess but not much help when dealing with a problem that arose on Wall Street and Main Street at the most granular levels of human greed, negligence, ignorance and disinterest.

As we all know, the housing crisis had many mothers. But, trying to understand and address it from 30,000 feet is, in my view, a mistake.

That is why I say bring in the entrepreneurs. Create a contest and invite entrepreneurs to come up with ideas for slowing down foreclosures and addressing falling housing prices. The winning ideas would receive government support (financial or otherwise) with the entrepreneurs standing to gain a lot of money if their suggestions work (and lose money if they don’t).

Now watch the ideas fly. People who have their money on the line – and with the opportunity to make big money if their ideas work – tend to be very creative. If necessity is the mother of invention, opportunity might be the father.

Entrepreneurs will stay up long hours, work day and night, risk money and relationships if they believe they are on to something. The fact is that we have a real issue with U.S. housing – foreclosures are not slowing down, the government’s ideas for modifying mortgages have not taken hold, housing prices are stabilizing a bit but only at the very low ends and consumers still are unsure about real estate.

I say turn the entrepreneurs loose. Yes, put governors (not the elected type) on the ideas so nothing crazy gets tried. But who knows what “crazy” is today anyway. Our country was built by nutty ideas carried forward by men and women who had something really serious to gain. Let’s turn these people loose on our big challenges of the day.

Jim Randel is the founder of The Skinny On book series. His book, The Skinny on the Housing Crisis, was just awarded first prize in a book competition sponsored by NAREE – an association of 650 journalists and professionals with interests in housing, finance and business.

Read more: Financial Crisis, Investing, Foreclosure, Entrepreneurship, Business, Economy, Housing Crisis, Business News